Lighting and Portraiture Tutorials

Over-Used Post-processing Techniques

Film, filters, chemical processing, and paper used to be the determining factor in the overall look and texture of an image.  Digital changed all that so long ago that even many of us old pros don’t make the comparisons between the old darkroom and the digital one anymore.  The look of our images is determined initially by our choices during the actual photography, then altered in substantial ways by our post-processing in Lightroom, Photoshop, or some other image editor.

Like so many others, I’ve been through phases where one or another basic look or effect appealed to me so much that I used it regularly, but eventually started to get bored with it or grew to dislike it.  An eventual backlash will happen when something is overused or becomes cliché.  Digital punch and crispness can only be appealing as long as it’s new.  And Instagram effects are cool until you see the same ones used over and over until the nostalgia they elicit simply becomes the latest vintage effect that gets old and boring.

I’ve decided to take a recent image and create some examples of a few of the post-processing techniques I’ve used over the years.  Actually, it’s fair to say that I still use these to some degree but I’m just not as obvious about it anymore.  And maybe that’s the lesson; subtlety and moderation can go a long way when it comes to post.

post-processing-demo1Image #1:  This is the image that I am happy with.  Basic retouching for skin and flyaway hair.

post-processing-demo2Image #2:  A basic black/white conversion in Lightroom.

post-processing-demo3Image #3:  Selective color is something I really do not like.

post-processing-demo4Image #4:  The vignette is my vice.

post-processing-demo5Image #5:  Yes, you can bump up the saturation with ease.  But should you?

post-processing-demo6Image #6:  Super-saturated, glowy overlay.  The lazy skin fix.

post-processing-demo7Image #7:  Heavy retouching.  Too plastic for my taste, but I used to do it often.

post-processing-demo8Image #8:  White vignette and over-exposing the skin to blow out the details.  Meh.

Lately, I’m much more interested in subdued colors and sharpness without the bite.  I don’t want my images to look necessarily like film photography, but I don’t want them to scream “digital” either.  So, I continue to refine my personal taste and execution.  Moving back and forth, looking for that balance.  That’s part of the discovery process.  We outgrow the things we get too familiar with, but we never outgrow the classics and the fundamental aesthetics that we seem to always go back to.

Getting Paid to Fix Just About Anything

“Oh, you can fix that. I know you have a tool that does that. You can tune that. You can edit this to death. You can adjust this, you can adjust that. They know, unfortunately, the tools that are available to us. And yes, we can. It’s time consuming, but yes, we can fix just about anything.” — Nick Sansano, record producer, from PressPausePlay (2011, House of Radon)

It’s a new world where everything is editable. Musicians have Auto-Tune, Protools, and any number of corrective tools available on the racks and computers at the nearest recording studio. Many expect that digitally processed on-the-fly corrections and adjustments to what they sing and play will be part of the package when they hire a sound engineer or producer. They understand how cut-and-paste track editing works. Kids are savvy with the technology because it’s available to them, to some degree, on their own computers and at little, if any cost. The way that some young bands and singers come into the studio expecting that some kind of audio Photoshop will take place might drive engineers crazy, if they weren’t getting paid for the extra hours spent tweaking things on request.  Photographers can learn something from recording studio professionals.

Everyone’s a photographer now, and digital photo manipulation is not something “extra” anymore, it’s just part of the process of taking any snapshot. People think that because consumer-level photo editing–the kind they do with their Instagram or on their laptops–is how photos are made these days, that the professional photographer they hire most certainly does this, too. In fact, many might assume that since you’re a pro, you probably have the special tools and skills and workflow to easily take a group photo and rearrange people and swap faces in the shot. Requests for replacing part or all of a background, fixing hair, or making someone look thinner are all common, and in some cases, very reasonable. But photographers complain about it.

Here are a couple of suggestions for dealing with the new reality (is it really that new anymore?) of what people expect out of you when they hire you for a portrait or event: 1) Learn to shoot the images in such a way that flatters your subjects, or otherwise gives them what they want in order to cut down on “fixing” things later; 2) Learn how to do the editing, because it’s part of the job now; 3) Make sure you specify, before you take a job, what you will do, and what you won’t do, and what you charge for. If you’re working, you need to be compensated for your time. If you are spending time editing and retouching, make sure those hours are either factored into your job price, or that you can bill for them after the fact.

Oh, and number one on the list above is very important.  Knowing how to take the kind of photos your customers want is key.  A lot of people have cameras, and a lot of people take good photos.  But if you’re a professional photographer, shouldn’t your work be of a professional level?  If you find you’re doing a lot of fixing in post, maybe you need to learn how not to break it “in-camera.”  Again, however you go about your professional work, at least make sure you get paid for ALL of your time working on a customer’s images/products, or you won’t be doing this for very long.

On a slightly different note, I highly recommend you watch the documentary, PressPausePlay which explores the possible consequences of the democratization of culture as it relates to art (the quote at the beginning of this post is from an interview from the film).  It’s an eye opener.  Get ready to roll with the changes.