Lighting and Portraiture Tutorials

New Book: Basic Lighting For Portraits

My new book, Basic Lighting For Portrait Photography, has just been released.  I believe this is an important learning guide for any photographer interested in better lighting.  It’s been designed to quickly walk you through several lessons which will allow you to create sophisticated lighting from day one, and you’ll learn more each step of the way.  You can start from anywhere in the book and use any of the setups right away, but I suggest going through each chapter in order, learning a fundamental technique and building upon it as you progress through the book.

Each setup, each example adds more to your understanding of professional photographic lighting.  The text is straight to the point without the verbiage and discussion of lighting theory of other books.  The lighting diagrams I’ve created are so easy to understand you’ll get it the moment you see it!   More info is available here:  Basic Lighting For Portrait Photography.

Basic Lighting eBook

book diagram

Lots of helpful diagrams.  I believe my 3D diagrams are among the best, and easiest to understand, in photography instruction.

behind the scenes

I’ll show you how to use simple light to get impressive results right away.

example

You’ll see what works, and how to create it yourself.  Straight, out-of-camera examples.

Get more info at: Basic Lighting For Portrait Photography.

Over-Used Post-processing Techniques

Film, filters, chemical processing, and paper used to be the determining factor in the overall look and texture of an image.  Digital changed all that so long ago that even many of us old pros don’t make the comparisons between the old darkroom and the digital one anymore.  The look of our images is determined initially by our choices during the actual photography, then altered in substantial ways by our post-processing in Lightroom, Photoshop, or some other image editor.

Like so many others, I’ve been through phases where one or another basic look or effect appealed to me so much that I used it regularly, but eventually started to get bored with it or grew to dislike it.  An eventual backlash will happen when something is overused or becomes cliché.  Digital punch and crispness can only be appealing as long as it’s new.  And Instagram effects are cool until you see the same ones used over and over until the nostalgia they elicit simply becomes the latest vintage effect that gets old and boring.

I’ve decided to take a recent image and create some examples of a few of the post-processing techniques I’ve used over the years.  Actually, it’s fair to say that I still use these to some degree but I’m just not as obvious about it anymore.  And maybe that’s the lesson; subtlety and moderation can go a long way when it comes to post.

post-processing-demo1Image #1:  This is the image that I am happy with.  Basic retouching for skin and flyaway hair.

post-processing-demo2Image #2:  A basic black/white conversion in Lightroom.

post-processing-demo3Image #3:  Selective color is something I really do not like.

post-processing-demo4Image #4:  The vignette is my vice.

post-processing-demo5Image #5:  Yes, you can bump up the saturation with ease.  But should you?

post-processing-demo6Image #6:  Super-saturated, glowy overlay.  The lazy skin fix.

post-processing-demo7Image #7:  Heavy retouching.  Too plastic for my taste, but I used to do it often.

post-processing-demo8Image #8:  White vignette and over-exposing the skin to blow out the details.  Meh.

Lately, I’m much more interested in subdued colors and sharpness without the bite.  I don’t want my images to look necessarily like film photography, but I don’t want them to scream “digital” either.  So, I continue to refine my personal taste and execution.  Moving back and forth, looking for that balance.  That’s part of the discovery process.  We outgrow the things we get too familiar with, but we never outgrow the classics and the fundamental aesthetics that we seem to always go back to.

Light Dropoff for Darker Backgrounds

A reader wrote to me to ask about light drop-off when using umbrellas as described in my ebook, 100% Reliable Flash Photography. Although the topic of drop-off isn’t really covered in the book, it’s a good one to discuss. The question had to do with how I was able to avoid lighting up much of the environment (especially the background) while getting plenty of light on my subject.

Because many of the examples shown in the book were created using large (approx. 43″) shoot-through umbrellas and powerful flash, you’d think that the light would spread and bounce all around the room. The thing is, it does. But that doesn’t mean everything in the room gets the same amount of illumination or exposure. As distance from the light to an object increases, the intensity of that light drops-off dramatically. The principle is explained in this video. And that’s why, in photos like this, you don’t see the subject and the background with the same amount of brightness:

Of course, even if you decrease the distance from the light to the background, it can still appear darker even though there’s actually more light hitting it. How? Well, as long as you you decrease exposure, for example by using a smaller aperture (higher f-stop number), and don’t move the light close enough to the background to make up the difference, you’ll force the background to become under-exposed; it will look darker.

In our example below, as I move the light closer to the subject it becomes more intense on the subject. This means the subject will require a smaller aperture for a proper exposure. Again, the subject gets a brighter burst of flash, so we need a smaller aperture.

And although I’m also moving the light closer to the background at the same time, it’s still too far from the subject (where the accurate exposure is happening for the aperture in use), to get a proper exposure. The background is getting under-exposed.

Take a closer look at the photos, settings, and distances shown to understand how this works.

 

All images were shot using the following settings:
ISO 200, Shutter Speed 1/125, Flash output 1/8 power.

Above: Aperture is f/5.6. Light is 4 ft from the subject and 8 ft from the gray seamless background.

Above: I moved the light approx. half the distance from the subject, so the aperture had to be increased to f/9 for a proper exposure on the subject. Light is 2 ft from the subject and now 6 ft from the gray seamless background. Because of the smaller aperture, the background is further under-exposed. Note that here it might look darker than in the original image.

Above: Next, I again moved the light to approx. half its previous distance from the subject. Aperture is f/13. Light is 1 ft from the subject and 5 ft from the gray seamless background. Although we have the proper exposure (aperture/ISO setting) for the light at this power and this distance from the subject, the background is 5X the distance from the subject so it goes pretty dark at these settings.

Note:  This article originally appeared in the newsletter.  Signup to get the latest tips and updates.

Off-Camera Lighting for Small Flash Units

YouTube Preview Image

Here’s a new video tutorial from the Photography in 3 Minutes series.  In this episode, I demonstrate how to setup a flash on a light stand, with an umbrella modifier.