Lighting and Portraiture Tutorials

Over-Used Post-processing Techniques

Film, filters, chemical processing, and paper used to be the determining factor in the overall look and texture of an image.  Digital changed all that so long ago that even many of us old pros don’t make the comparisons between the old darkroom and the digital one anymore.  The look of our images is determined initially by our choices during the actual photography, then altered in substantial ways by our post-processing in Lightroom, Photoshop, or some other image editor.

Like so many others, I’ve been through phases where one or another basic look or effect appealed to me so much that I used it regularly, but eventually started to get bored with it or grew to dislike it.  An eventual backlash will happen when something is overused or becomes cliché.  Digital punch and crispness can only be appealing as long as it’s new.  And Instagram effects are cool until you see the same ones used over and over until the nostalgia they elicit simply becomes the latest vintage effect that gets old and boring.

I’ve decided to take a recent image and create some examples of a few of the post-processing techniques I’ve used over the years.  Actually, it’s fair to say that I still use these to some degree but I’m just not as obvious about it anymore.  And maybe that’s the lesson; subtlety and moderation can go a long way when it comes to post.

post-processing-demo1Image #1:  This is the image that I am happy with.  Basic retouching for skin and flyaway hair.

post-processing-demo2Image #2:  A basic black/white conversion in Lightroom.

post-processing-demo3Image #3:  Selective color is something I really do not like.

post-processing-demo4Image #4:  The vignette is my vice.

post-processing-demo5Image #5:  Yes, you can bump up the saturation with ease.  But should you?

post-processing-demo6Image #6:  Super-saturated, glowy overlay.  The lazy skin fix.

post-processing-demo7Image #7:  Heavy retouching.  Too plastic for my taste, but I used to do it often.

post-processing-demo8Image #8:  White vignette and over-exposing the skin to blow out the details.  Meh.

Lately, I’m much more interested in subdued colors and sharpness without the bite.  I don’t want my images to look necessarily like film photography, but I don’t want them to scream “digital” either.  So, I continue to refine my personal taste and execution.  Moving back and forth, looking for that balance.  That’s part of the discovery process.  We outgrow the things we get too familiar with, but we never outgrow the classics and the fundamental aesthetics that we seem to always go back to.

Getting Paid to Fix Just About Anything

“Oh, you can fix that. I know you have a tool that does that. You can tune that. You can edit this to death. You can adjust this, you can adjust that. They know, unfortunately, the tools that are available to us. And yes, we can. It’s time consuming, but yes, we can fix just about anything.” — Nick Sansano, record producer, from PressPausePlay (2011, House of Radon)

It’s a new world where everything is editable. Musicians have Auto-Tune, Protools, and any number of corrective tools available on the racks and computers at the nearest recording studio. Many expect that digitally processed on-the-fly corrections and adjustments to what they sing and play will be part of the package when they hire a sound engineer or producer. They understand how cut-and-paste track editing works. Kids are savvy with the technology because it’s available to them, to some degree, on their own computers and at little, if any cost. The way that some young bands and singers come into the studio expecting that some kind of audio Photoshop will take place might drive engineers crazy, if they weren’t getting paid for the extra hours spent tweaking things on request.  Photographers can learn something from recording studio professionals.

Everyone’s a photographer now, and digital photo manipulation is not something “extra” anymore, it’s just part of the process of taking any snapshot. People think that because consumer-level photo editing–the kind they do with their Instagram or on their laptops–is how photos are made these days, that the professional photographer they hire most certainly does this, too. In fact, many might assume that since you’re a pro, you probably have the special tools and skills and workflow to easily take a group photo and rearrange people and swap faces in the shot. Requests for replacing part or all of a background, fixing hair, or making someone look thinner are all common, and in some cases, very reasonable. But photographers complain about it.

Here are a couple of suggestions for dealing with the new reality (is it really that new anymore?) of what people expect out of you when they hire you for a portrait or event: 1) Learn to shoot the images in such a way that flatters your subjects, or otherwise gives them what they want in order to cut down on “fixing” things later; 2) Learn how to do the editing, because it’s part of the job now; 3) Make sure you specify, before you take a job, what you will do, and what you won’t do, and what you charge for. If you’re working, you need to be compensated for your time. If you are spending time editing and retouching, make sure those hours are either factored into your job price, or that you can bill for them after the fact.

Oh, and number one on the list above is very important.  Knowing how to take the kind of photos your customers want is key.  A lot of people have cameras, and a lot of people take good photos.  But if you’re a professional photographer, shouldn’t your work be of a professional level?  If you find you’re doing a lot of fixing in post, maybe you need to learn how not to break it “in-camera.”  Again, however you go about your professional work, at least make sure you get paid for ALL of your time working on a customer’s images/products, or you won’t be doing this for very long.

On a slightly different note, I highly recommend you watch the documentary, PressPausePlay which explores the possible consequences of the democratization of culture as it relates to art (the quote at the beginning of this post is from an interview from the film).  It’s an eye opener.  Get ready to roll with the changes.

15 Photo Projects That Will Boost Your Creativity

Here’s a new eBook that I’ve been working on over the past few months.  It’s called, 15 Photo Projects That Will Boost Your Creativity.  My hope is that readers will use what I’ve presented as a starting point to open their minds up to new ways of working with their cameras and subjects. Some of these projects may ignite your creativity and some may simply prompt you to learn a valuable new skill.  More info here >>

Shared (Not Taken) With Instagram

Instagram image shot with iPhone, West Harlem Piers Park

Should you post your DSLR-taken images–or any image not actually shot with your cell phone and the Instagram app–on Instagram?  Ok, so there are two schools of thought on this subject.  One says that the spirit of Instagram’s social image sharing service is being violated by those who post images that aren’t taken with the app.  In other words, you should only share photos shot with the Instagram app, on Instagram.  Then there are people like me who feel that Instagram is simply another way to share images with people who follow you.  Instagram to me, is not defined by its camera component as much as its sharing platform.  Key evidence supporting my view:  if the app wasn’t intended to allow you to import images from other sources then why would that option be there?

Most of the people I follow, which include models, photographers, and photography enthusiasts in general, use Instagram in several ways.  That’s the way of social networking; the members of the network will eventually use the service as they deem most appropriate.  So, I see a combination of cell phone snapshots with the typical Instagram effects and borders, and images taken with other cameras, often fully edited DSLR shots.  There are hybrid shares, too; DSLR photos with Instagram effects and borders added, for instance.

Shot with Instagram, Holga camera and film.

What’s interesting is that many of us will turn around and share those Instagram photos in places other than Instagram.  Whether it’s done with an API-powered sharing service, a print fulfillment service, or manually transferred from your phone to your computer for sharing, images taken with Instagram aren’t locked-in to that world with no chance of being shared or seen elsewhere.  That’s great, even if it bothers the detractors and purists who believe that there’s only one right way to use the app and service.

On that note, here’s a tip for sharing your DSLR images, or other images that don’t conform to the square Instagram format, on Instagram.  Most cell phone and DSLR images are rectangular, and I’ve noticed that if I try to import a rectangular image in vertical/portrait orientation (long side up and down), the app forces me to crop to achieve the square format.  Interestingly, if the image being imported is in horizontal/landscape orientation (long side from left to right), the app squeezes it into the square, placing a black border on top and bottom; kind of like letterboxing.

What I do when I want to share a shot off my DSLR is simply send a web-sized version of it to myself via email, open the email on my phone, and save it to my phone’s image album.  I next tap the “image” icon on the Instagram app which allows me to import the image to the app.  If the image is of vertical orientation and I want to make sure it’s not going to be cropped, I’ll usually create a square version of it, prior to the steps above, in Photoshop.  This simply involves extending the image canvass out to the sides (usually in black).  Any side cropping to make sure it’s square can either be done with the cropping tool in Photoshop, or in Instagram itself.

DSLR image shared with Instagram. Sides were extended in Photoshop to prevent Instagram from cropping the image.

One caveat:  When sharing from the Instagram app to a service like Tumblr, it unfortunately captions it with “Taken with Instagram” rather than “Shared with Instagram.”  I think the latter would be more appropriate given that Instagram does allow images to be imported and shared that weren’t actually “taken” with the app’s camera feature.